Newspaper correction from Michael Rosen interview is amazing

"Who did the interview, Boris Johnson?"

Legendary writer and activist Michael Rosen has a book coming out, see below, but that’s not what we are here for.

‘Pre-order your copy of Getting Better here: https://t.co/7K2cOwBA0F’ pic.twitter.com/tmguiW6n9O
— Michael Rosen 💙💙🎓🎓 (@MichaelRosenYes) December 20, 2022

He was also incensed by Michael Gove’s new plan to cut parents’ benefits if their kids don’t go to school.

He tweeted: “I didn’t trust myself to post this before in case my tweet was covered in speckles of blood caused by my rage on reading it.”

I didn't trust myself to post this before in case my tweet was covered in speckles of blood caused by my rage on reading it.https://t.co/DIH6ZW0E5P
— Michael Rosen 💙💙🎓🎓 (@MichaelRosenYes) March 1, 2023

Corrections

But it was a corrections and clarifications section of the Times that has gone viral.

Frank Lampard agrees to become Coventry City’s new manager

November 22, 2024

King Charles supports food charity with 76th birthday initiative

King Charles III’s coronation reveals staggering cost to UK taxpayers

November 22, 2024

It appears an interview he conducted with the paper made a huge number of mistakes.

Apart from that, ⁦@MichaelRosenYes,⁩ how did you enjoy the ⁦@thetimes⁩ article? pic.twitter.com/qSh8Rp3iLN
— David Brindle (@DavidJ_Brindle) February 28, 2023

Rosen simply responded with “Ahem.”

Ahem
— Michael Rosen 💙💙🎓🎓 (@MichaelRosenYes) February 28, 2023

Reactions

It might have been quicker Michael to point out the *accurate* parts of the interview 😂
— Alexis 🙏🏽🍷🌎 (@TocquevilleJnr) March 1, 2023

I suspect if you’d cleared your throat during the interview it would have been a fart in print.
— Mark Hinman (@HinmanMark) February 28, 2023

Yes! Read this yesterday and ended up wondering what if anything they got right. Bizarre. Are all interviews in the @thetimes actually works of fiction?
— Rob Wright (@RobWright126) March 1, 2023